MICHAEL JACKSON VERDICT:
CROTCH CAMS NOW MANDATORY TO PROTECT YOUR CHILD FROM BEING MOLESTED BY THE NOBILITY

by

Neal Horsley

(Christian Gallery News Service, June 14, 2005)  Yesterday Michael Jackson was found not guilty of all charges by a California jury.  Accused of numerous counts of child molestation, the jury decided to free Michael Jackson because, as one juror said after the trial, "The evidence was just not there."  An examination of that "inadequate" evidence leads to the conclusion that equipping underage children with crotch cameras is the only way to protect them from molestation by members of America's popular nobility.

The evidence against Jackson included eye witness testimony of the alleged molestation: the child Jackson was accused of molesting testified under oath that Jackson had put his hand down the boy's pants and "fondled" his genitals; another child--the brother of Jackson's accuser--also testified that he witnessed Jackson's hand in his brother's pants.  Additional eyewitness testimony was presented by persons who either claimed to have been molested by Jackson when they were minors or had seen Jackson molest other minors. Determining that this eye witness testimony was not sufficient to convict Michael Jackson, the jury decided to set Jackson free. 

If the evidence presented at Jackson's trial cannot lead a jury to convict, what evidence would?  If the eye witness testimony of a molested child is not to be believed, even when that testimony is validated by the eye witness testimony of a bystander, what would it take to successfully prosecute a child molester if that person is a member of the popular nobility?

It is obvious that Jackson's membership in the nobility played a part in his exoneration.  His legal defense was one only the nobility could mount.  And every person must admit that the fact that Michael Jackson was once known as the King of Pop had some influence in the jury's decision.

Deep down, nobody is surprised.  Throughout the course of western civilization the lower classes have always tended to believe members of the nobility were to be judged by different standards than those used in judging the lower classes.

Can anyone deny that that pattern appears to be reappearing in this generation as a string of high profile cases involving the popular nobility--the kings and dukes and popular potentates like O.J. Simpson, Robert Blake, and now Michael Jackson--all received not guilty verdicts from California juries, letting the nobles walk free as a bird as their alleged victims rotted in the ground or languished as social outcasts forever labeled as de facto perjurers rather than molestation victims.

Under these circumstances, any parent must reassess what is required to protect their children from molesters.

CAN CROTCH CAMS SOLVE THE PROBLEM  OF CHILD MOLESTATION?

What will it take for children to survive unmolested in California or anywhere members of America's present popular nobility gather to live and play?

In such a context, the idea of crotch cams for vulnerable young people begins to make a lot of sense.  A relatively simple operation can implant a small video device in the child's navel.  If the video device is implanted to point downward, the crotch area will be monitored clearly at all times, even when the child is asleep (in case the child ends up at a Neverland sleepover).  When the operation heals, it will be nearly impossible for the nobility to ferret out the monitoring device. 

In the event of molestation by the nobility, photographic evidence of the molestation would be available to the jury.

Of course, we must admit that there are practical limitations to any attempt to protect children from the nobility's sexual predators.  If Michael Jackson can escape conviction, there is some question about whether any jury from this present generation of American citizens would be willing to convict any member of the nobility.   Under the present homosexual-friendly mindset of the vast majority of Americans, it is only the slightest exaggeration to say that a jury might well refuse to convict Michael Jackson even if a picture like the one below was authentically obtained by an underage molestation victim with a crotch cam.

Return to Christian Gallery News Service