The Abortionist To Be Killed Next:

Who Will Benefit Most?

By

Neal Horsley

(Christian Gallery News Service, June 9, 2002)As this article will show, the answer to the question asked above is as hard to find, as the question itself was hard to formulate.

For you to decipher that cryptic statement I will need to compare and contrast two events: 1. a recent attack on a medical doctor in Memphis, Tennessee, and 2. nearly simultaneous with that attack, a national fund raising letter sent out by Planned Parenthood Federation of America over the signature of Gloria Feldt, President.

Event 1.  The "Memphis Appeal," the Scripps-Howard newspaper in Memphis, Tennessee, has been following the story of an attack and beating of Dr. O.C. Smith, the Shelby County, Tennessee Medical Examiner, an attack that occurred as Dr. Smith was leaving his office on the evening of June 1, 2002.  In the aftermath of that attack, three letters were received purporting to be from the person who attacked Dr. Smith.

An excerpt of the "TEXT OF THREATENING LETTERS", published in the Memphis Appeal on June 4, 2002 follows: "DOCTOR-KILLERS killing the INNOCENT and UNBORN offend GOD and the CHRISTIANS of the ONE TRUE CHURCH. God is calling upon US TO ACT and DESTROY the EVIL DOERS, pawns of SATAN with souls lost and SPAWNED in HELL. He cannot have the DEMONS cast from him. Only by DEATH is GOD's WORLD RECLAIMED…Long have I waited for my HOLY ORDER to fight against the DOCTOR-KILLER abortionists but now I know OUR LORD WAS saving me for something greater. "

Event 2.  At about the same time the story above began to unfold, Planned Parenthood Federation of America mailed a national fund raising appeal letter in the form of a "Survey."

The Planned Parenthood letter defined its purpose: "Most importantly, we want to use the information drawn from this survey to prove to President Bush--and the members of the anti-choice congress--that the majority of Americans support reproductive rights…Your input to this survey can be a major weapon in our battle for reproductive rights…

Then the letter explained why people receiving the letter should respond:  "You should have no doubts--freedom of choice is far from secure…In Congress, the White House and in more and more state legislatures, anti-choice political extremists are in power…Every day, our clinics face violence from opponents…Every month more and more doctors retire from their reproductive health practices so they and their families can escape harassment.  As a result, more and more women find it difficult to get the health care services they need…The struggle [emphasis theirs] we face is truly life threatening--we cannot afford to lost this battle…"

Section Six of the "survey" was labeled "ANTI-CHOICE VIOLENCE" and it contained the following questions:

1.         Which of the following two questions most nearly reflects your opinion:

q       Violence against reproductive health centers represents a major threat to reproductive rights in this nation.

q       Violence against reproductive health centers is not very prevalent and is not a major threat to reproductive rights.

2.         Have  you seen much media coverage, either through local or national sources, concerning anti-choice violence?

q       Yes

q       No

3.         In your opinion, which of the following would be most effective in combating violence against doctors, staff and patients at reproductive health care centers?  (Rank from one to five in order of importance, 1 being more important.)

__   Severely prosecuting those convicted of violence against reproductive health centers.

__  Increasing federal law enforcement protections at reproductive health centers.

__  Constructing health care centers with greater security measures and barriers to entry.

__   Training volunteers to defend health care centers against intruders.

__   Conducting intelligence activities to thwart extremist operations.

Section Seven was entitled: INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR STATE.

            3.         Are you aware of any anti-choice activities in your state?

q       Yes

q       No

4.         If yes, what types of anti-choice activities are prevalent in your area?

q       Anti-choice demonstrations and rallies

q       Barricades of health care centers that provide abortions.

q       Dissemination of misleading information about abortion and contraception.

q       Consistent picketing and/or vigils outside of clinics.

q       Violence, including but not limited to bombings, shootings, arson, or burglary.

Examine the two stories and it does not take a genius or PHD social scientist to make a connection between the Memphis abortionist killer wannabe and the Planned Parenthood fund raising letter.  One feeds the other as surely as heroin feeds a heroin addict.  In other words, it is the specter of violence embodied by the god-crazed abortionist murderer that is being used to mobilize and energize and open the pocket books of Planned Parenthood supporters.

That leads logically to the question: who benefits the most when an abortionist is killed in a political context like the one that has existed in the USA since abortion was legalized and made a sacrament for those who worship at the altar of self-indulgence?

Even though the question might be wordy, you get the point: Planned Parenthood has erected their entire fund raising apparatus on the slippery blood soaked surface occupied by slain and battered abortionists.  That surface is the slipperiest of slippery slopes.  To make your financial survival dependent upon the presence of dead and battered abortionists is a dangerous fund raising strategy, to say the least.  If it does not create a temptation within Planned Parenthood to manufacture more assassinated abortionists should they be found in short supply, the strategy at least creates a suspicion in the minds of others that Planned Parenthood might be willing to see dead abortionists.  After all, there are millions of people in the USA who believe Planned Parenthood is perfectly willing to profit off the mangled corpses of very small human beings. The rhetorical question would logically follow: What would prevent them from profiting off the corpses of full grown people if it appeared necessary to Planned Parenthood’s “holistic” agenda?

Of course few people have actually accused Planned Parenthood of actively recruiting abortionist assassins--although that theory will certainly be presented during the upcoming trial of James Kopp, the accused assassin of Dr. Barnett Slepian.

Were it not for the fact that every time an abortionist is killed it causes all existing abortionists and all potential abortionists to reexamine their respective bottom lines, it might be fairly easy to persuade people that Planned Parenthood is in the abortion assassination business.  But that fact does exist.   Since no one doubts that Planned Parenthood profits most when the most unborn babies are aborted, the cost/benefit analysis makes it clear Planned Parenthood cannot afford to have all the abortionists quit killing unborn babies.  In other words, without abortionists, Planned Parenthood would be out of business.  That is why when an abortionist is killed most people look immediately at the abortion abolition movement for the culprit.  What people have not done is realized that when an occasional abortionist is killed in such a way that all abortionists are not driven from the nation, it might actually be the key to Planned Parenthood’s long term cash flow needs.

Any analysis of who benefits most when an abortionist is killed is not complete without recognizing that there is a third party most interested in this subject; a party, that is, in addition to the supporters of Planned Parenthood and the supporters of abortion abolition: that third party is the unborn baby scheduled to be aborted.

Speaking for the soon-to-be-aborted person, who in this article, as is so often the case in this world, has no voice other than my own, I can say without fear of being proven wrong that the unborn baby, if it comes to a choice between the life of the abortionist and the unborn baby's own life, would benefit most should all abortionists presently active be killed as soon as possible.

But that is a dangerous thing to say.  Even though any person who actually granted the unborn baby their humanity and put their self in the unborn baby's place would agree that any unborn baby--if he/she were allowed to vote--would naturally value their life above the life of the abortionist planning to kill them, it is still dangerous to say anything about the murder of abortionists except those things that have been pre-approved for public consumption.

I know full well how dangerous a thing it is to become a spokesman for babies waiting to be aborted in the United States of America.  I have found that it is dangerous even if what you say is a self-evidently obvious fact like the one in the preceding paragraph.  Doing so has caused me to be the target of hate, hate so strong that on many occasions, often before a national television audience, I have been accused of wanting to see abortionists killed.

As I have always said, I do not want to see anyone killed.  But the fact is we the people are killing, covered by the color of law created by the Supreme Court of the United States of America, over three thousand of God's unborn children in the United States of American each day that passes.  The fact that so much carnage against God's children has been swept under the carpet in this nation for so long causes grave and potentially fatal effects to occur.  Any person who thinks that the blood of thousands of God’s children can be, totally without any authority from God and contrary to His explicit instructions, splattered from sea to shining sea in the United States of American and yet this nation escape horrendous consequences to us all simply knows nothing whatsoever about the God of Abraham who is in history the God and Father of the Lord Jesus Christ.

The Apostle Paul described in his letter to the Romans precisely the effects I am talking about:

^1:18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and
unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

¹⁹Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath
showed it unto them. ²⁰For the invisible things of him from the creation of the
world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his
eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: ²¹Because that,
when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but
became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
²²Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, ²³And changed the glory
of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to
birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

 ²⁴Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: ²⁵Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

 ²⁶For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even
their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: ²⁷And
likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust
one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and
receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet. ²⁸And
even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over
to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; ²⁹Being filled
with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness;
full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, ³⁰Backbiters, haters of
God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
³¹Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection,
implacable, unmerciful: ³²Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which
commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure
in them that do them.

         Reread the effects described above and you will see a horrible irony: some of the evils the Apostle Paul describes as evidence of God turning a people over to their sins are exactly the actions that have been legalized in the USA. It does not take a Biblical scholar to see that when the Apostle refers to "…their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly…" he is talking about homosexuality; and when the Apostle refers to people "… without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful…" he is precisely describing people who kill their own children.

      Is it not clear that the effects described by the Apostle have been given full access to the United States of America?  Effects like those are inevitably fatal to individuals, and--if history is any guide--equally fatal to nations.

      Another irony, one I participate in daily is this: As the United States of America stands up before the world and crows about our vaunted "freedoms," the freedom to speak the hard truth about the evil that has been unleashed in this nation is slowly being taken away from me.  Watch what this government is doing to those of us who actually accept responsibility to speak for the unborn and you will see that unless God intervenes and brings the majority to its right mind, the only "freedoms" that will exist in the USA are the "freedoms" to commit horrible abominations against the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.

       Since the USA have already been "turned over" to the consequences of our sins because of our refusal to honor God as God, questions about who will benefit most from the growing carnage and insanity in our midst will tend to disappear because they will become moot questions as we all impotently scramble like brute beasts to survive.  But until then, we would be wise to recognize that when abortionists are killed not all things are as they appear to be at first glance.

Part Two: Could Planned Parenthood Have Ordered The Murder of Dr. Barnett Slepian?

Return To The Christian Gallery News Service